The New York Times A Nation at War March 28, 2003  

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
- Africa
- Americas
- Asia Pacific
- Europe
- Middle East
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
NYC Guide
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia/Photos
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
College
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
Go to Advanced Search/Archive Go to Advanced Search/Archive Symbol Lookup
Search Optionsdivide
go to Member Center Log Out
  Welcome, cybracero

Divided Over Another War, but Still on Speaking Terms

By LESLIE EATON

Across Fifth Avenue from an antiwar demonstration yesterday in Manhattan, Steve Durgee, 33, brandished an American flag and a sign that read "Move to France (please!)." Speeding by on Rollerblades, Roger Manning, 46, said, "You people are fools!"

The two men started to yell at each other, then to argue, then to talk. No minds were changed, but in a few minutes the long-haired Mr. Manning and the short-haired Mr. Durgee were saying things like, "I have no problem with discussion," and "Good point."

Americans may not agree on the wisdom of going to war with Iraq, but polls and interviews around New York suggest that the two sides remain on speaking terms. While each side views the other as misguided, so far relatively few are voicing the vitriol about each other that characterized the last period of division over an American war.

Thirty years ago, after a decade of escalating war in Vietnam, slogans like "America, Love It or Leave It" carried an angry punch. This time, the mantra of many New Yorkers seems to be, "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion."

Take Michael Pearson, a 35-year-old carpenter who lives in Long Island City, Queens. He supports President Bush, he said, and thinks the antiwar protests have been counterproductive. But asked if these demonstrations should be permitted, he sounded almost incredulous.

"Oh, of course they should be able to protest, without a doubt," he said. "That's what we're fighting for."

Thirty-three years ago, construction workers beat up antiwar demonstrators on Wall Street and stormed City Hall. Four students were killed by the National Guard during a period of antiwar protests at Kent State. Families feuded over the dinner table. One 1970 Harris poll found that 37 percent of Americans thought that protests against the Vietnam War should be illegal.

Today, 61 percent say Americans who oppose the war should be allowed to hold protest marches and rallies, while 29 percent think that such activity is detrimental to the war effort, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll. The poll, based on telephone interviews conducted Sunday and Monday with 1,032 adults nationwide, has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Of course, just because you believe people can protest does not mean you believe that they should. "Once the war started, you should not protest anymore," said Salvatore Scarlato, 70, of Hauppauge, in Suffolk County, who is a veteran of the Korean War. "You should now say, `Let's support our troops and hope it's over soon.' "

And it is not hard to find war-related nastiness and name-calling (and not just on talk radio).

At the Fifth Avenue antiwar demonstration yesterday morning, outside Rockefeller Center, hecklers called protesters "traitors" and "freaks" and yelled "Get a job!" at young people in the crowd. The protesters in turn called those who disagreed with them "idiots" and tried to drown out dissent by chanting "Peace is patriotic."

The size of the crowd was hard to gauge because there were so many reporters, camera crews, uniformed police officers, plainclothes officers, tourists, kibitzers and people just trying to get to work. Several dozen protesters knocked over police barricades and lay down on Fifth Avenue, closing the road for about 16 minutes. Scattered protests continued during the day; the police said 215 people were arrested.

Those who have studied the Vietnam protests and those who participated in them have several explanations for why discourse may be more civil now. One is simply that these are still the early days of the war.

Disruptive demonstrations can wear out even the most tolerant. And more American casualties could easily harden the positions of both antiwar protesters and those who believe that the most important thing is to support the troops and their commander in chief.

But unlike the Vietnam-era protesters, demonstrators these days have been careful to express their admiration for those serving in the armed forces, and to avoid, for the most part, desecrating American flags. "Everyone is trying to grab the patriotic banner," said Christian G. Appy, whose "Patriots: The Vietnam War Remembered From All Sides," will be published by Viking in May.

Continued
1 | 2 | Next>>




THREATS AND RESPONSES: REACTION; Watching Intently As a War Is Born 6,000 Miles Away  (March 20, 2003)  $

THREATS AND RESPONSES: A COMMAND POST; Reluctant Saudi Arabia Prepares Its Quiet Role in the U.S.-Led War on Iraq  (March 20, 2003)  $

THREATS AND RESPONSES: IRAQI-AMERICANS; As War Starts, Refugees Feel a Mixture of Dread and Relief  (March 20, 2003)  $

THREATS AND RESPONSES: CALIFORNIA; Approach of War Reveals An Alienation in California  (March 20, 2003)  $

Find more results for Iraq and Public Opinion .



Doing research? Search the archive for more than 500,000 articles:




E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints
Single-Page View


Home | Back to International | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy
E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints
Single-Page View


Justin Lane for The New York Times
Emotions were running high yesterday as protesters, for and against the war, debated along Fifth Avenue.

A Nation at War

In Depth
Times War Correspondents
Reports Throughout the Region
Dispatches | Michael R. Gordon
Our Chief Military Correspondent Analyzes U.S. Strategy
Business and the War
Impact on Economy and Markets



Topics

 Alerts
Iraq
Public Opinion
Demonstrations and Riots
New York City
Create Your Own | Manage Alerts
Take a Tour
Sign Up for Newsletters


Angel Franco/The New York Times
Alex Rivera, camera in hand, was tackled by police officers yesterday near Rockefeller Center and taken away.


Justin Lane for The New York Times An antiwar protester waited to be loaded into a police van.